Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Shotgun approaches for WGS of pathogens directly from field samples are inefficient due to the excess of contaminating host DNA present in the samples, which result in very low sequence coverage of the low copy number bacterial genomes present [ 11].
Similar(59)
Here we show that rRNA removal from significantly degraded samples is inefficient.
Because it's a little bit unreasonable to think just because we are football we have no problems with it". Wenger also wants blood tests introduced, as urine samples are insufficient and inefficient in his view.
Thus, routine microbiological methods used to identify Shigella spp. from stool samples are relatively inefficient, time consuming, and labor intensive, and the diagnosis often remains obscure due to the presence of low numbers of causative organisms, competition from other commensal organisms, and inappropriate sample collection.
As in the case of sugarcane bagasse and the other grasses samples, the spectra of E. grandis x urophylla samples pretreated with hot water or sodium bisulfite were very similar to that of the untreated sample, which confirms that these pretreatments are inefficient in the removal of hemicelluloses and lignin.
Therefore, they are inefficient.
IPW estimators are inefficient.
However, the SRS sampling method is inefficient for its heavy computational burden due to the need of a large number of repeated calculations to obtain a specified accuracy.
As we observed, the current RJMCMC sampler can be inefficient in some cases with large observation intervals.
Finally, even if the sampled data were correct and complete (e.g. obtained from a theoretical model or Monte Carlo simulation), the storage of samples is very inefficient because of the size of the BRDF.
RDD sampling has always been inefficient, because some portion of the randomly generated numbers are inevitably non-working, and the process of accurately sorting out the live numbers is time-consuming and expensive.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com