Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(19)
All water samples are good or medium in quality: B or C categories.
According to PI values, all the samples are good for irrigation purposes.
The twenty samples are good enough for the maximum continuous package losses.
The chemical analyses results show that based on most of the parameters, the water samples are good for drinking.
Rock samples were obtained from a Chinese oilfield, and the sorting characteristics of clastic particles inside the rock samples are good or medium.
Based on SAR values 52%% of the groundwater samples are good for irrigation in almost all type of soil with little danger of exchangeable sodium.
Similar(41)
For analytical methods whose precision with low-heterogeneity samples is good, it is possible to calculate a laboratory sampling constant (K).
60%% of all samples were good to permissible; and 22%% were excellent to good categories.
Seven groundwater samples (9 %) were not suitable for irrigation, whereas rest of the samples is good (Fig. 8).
Based on RSC classification, 96.3% of the samples were good for irrigation whilst 3.7% were bad/unusable (Table 2).
A comparatively smaller percentage (16.7 %) was not fit for irrigation, whereas 65 samples were good for irrigation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com