Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(19)
A research programme was designed to (a) develop a standard methodology for analysing ink samples in a reproducible way, (b) comparing automatically and objectively ink samples and (c) evaluate the proposed methodology in forensic contexts.
The performance assessment included: (a) a three-level precision study, (b) a recovery study analyzing spiked samples, and (c) a method comparison with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) applied on real patient samples.
This proportion is more than 1 in layer A in four samples and C in one sample.
SEM images of (a) Al and (b) Fe nanoparticle samples, and (c, d) a statistical analysis of the size distribution of the two samples.
These results should be taken into account in order to (a) use them for soft cell labeling through the vapor phase, (b) avoid any contamination of control samples and (c) improve health protection of users.
The accuracy of the proposed technique was evaluated by using the following parameters: (a) three to five sensors taken from the total of six sensors, (b) 25 to 1000 samples, and (c) 10 times of iterations for each trial.
Similar(41)
Selection of the study cohort was based on availability of DNA samples and C-peptide measurements.
Recruitment of the subjects was based on (i) exclusion of subjects with anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, impaired glucose tolerance, and T2DM as well as (ii) inclusion of subjects of whom DNA samples and C-peptide measurements were available.
ARS, NEP, HB and SK carried out the behavioural testing and performed analyses of the blood samples and c-Fos immunohistochemistry. LL, GJ, and WS provided MPEP and have given approval of the manuscript.
(a) Sample A, (b) sample B, and (c) sample C. We also carried out XRD measurements for samples A and B, as shown in Figure 4a,b.
(a) Sample 1, (b) sample 2, and (c) sample 3. Figure 6a shows a low-magnification TEM image of sample 1, which exhibits several nanostructures.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com