Sentence examples for sample yielded significant from inspiring English sources

Neither analyses in the intent-to-treat nor the per-protocol sample yielded significant effects (intent-to-treat sample: time × group interaction, F (1, 29) = 0.16, p = 0.50; per-protocol sample: time × group interaction, F (1, 26) = 0.52, p = 0.47).

Using World Health Organization (WHO) standard definitions, this combined sample yielded significant rates of screen-detected diabetes (4%), isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (4%), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (15%), and "high-risk prediabetes" (i.e., both IGT and IFG [3%]).

Upstream samples yielded significant (P<0.05) C. dubia toxicity and reproduction impairments, while downstream samples only yielded reproduction impairments.

Heptane Soxhlet extractions and supercritical carbon dioxide extractions (scCO2) of hemp dust samples yielded significant quantities of high value lipophilic molecules including fatty acids, policosanols (fatty alcohols), fatty aldehydes, hydrocarbons, sterols, triterpenoids and cannabinoids (cannabidiol (CBD)).

Neither the high temperature nor the room temperature acid treated samples yielded significant ethanol (1.9 ± 0.3 and 2.0 ± 0.6 mg/g biomass) after fermentation, but contained ample free fermentable sugars (glucose, fructose, galactose, and mannose).

Detailed comparisons between normal and tumor FF and FFPE sample sets yielded significant fold-change correlations of R2∼0.70 and >70% of the differentially expressed transcripts shared between both FF and FFPE sample sets.

Again, only the US young adult sample analysis yielded significant results (likelihood ratio χ2 = 12.49, df = 2, p = 0.002), with the B1 ~ A1 (A ~ T) haplotype conferring risk for BPD traits: OR = 4.89 (2.05 - 11.66).

In addition, several samples that yielded significant PCR amplification products for the HVRI mtDNA region were used for further mtDNA sequencing characterization [33], [35].

ANOVA was employed to compare the average values of the miRNA probes in all samples and yielded significant P values (<0.05) in all cases.

Because of the large sample size, many comparisons yielded significant but not clinically meaningful differences.

Pairwise comparisons between the ancient and contemporary samples in GLM 1 yielded significant (p < 0.05) effects for amplicon (a) for all of the variables tested.