Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The counting growth layer method was successfully applied to 80% of the sample, with estimated ages from 1 to 18 years old, however it was more difficult to differentiate between adjacent growth layers for older individuals.
No major differences were observed between the complete sample with estimated NO2, the subsample with DNA, and the subsample with both DNA and NO2 [see Supplemental Material, Table 1 (doi:10.1289/ehp.0900589.S1 via http://dx.doi.org)].
Similar(58)
Samples with estimated CAM origins in the transition zone in central Cameroon consisted of both mtDNA haplotypes (i.e., purple and orange circles).
We aimed at a total sampling with estimated sampling coverages of on average 76.83% and 56.38% for males and females, respectively, in the study plot (cf. Ringler et al. 2015).
In agreement with the original HMP studies (e.g. Huttenhower et al., 2012), we found that archaea are not among the abundant organisms in any of the samples with estimated fractions <1%.
Perchlorate was detected in all 2001 2002 NHANES urine samples, with estimated median and 95th percentile intakes of 0.066 μg/kg/day and 0.234 μg/kg/day, respectively, for adults > 20 years of age (Blount et al. 2007).
However, PAH levels were not correlated with turbidity (an indication of the amount of suspended particles in the sample) or with estimated flushing velocities (which are associated with sediment resuspension) (data not shown).
BBP was detected above the LOQ in 8 of 29 diet samples, with an estimated average concentration in all samples ranging from 17 19 ng/g ww.
DBP was detected above the LOQ in 6 of 29 total diet samples, with an estimated average concentration in all samples ranging from 90 190 ng/g ww.
Coverage of 95% C.I. = the percentage of the 500 samples with an estimated bpred with a 95% confidence interval containing the true population value.
In a Chinese children population study, BPA was found in 84.9% of urine samples, with an estimated mean of 0.45 ng/mL.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com