Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
Having a larger sample will make it easier to detect the mutation at fault.
It is a universal truth: Chuck D's "Hear the drummer get wicked" sample will make any goon get his Fred Astaire on.
Therefore, this sample will make it possible to differentiate more accurately between independent and substance-induced disorders.
The large sample size, high genetic diversity, and potentially simpler demographic history of the DPGP3 sample will make this a highly valuable resource for fundamental population genetic research.
Similar(56)
If it is b), then having experiments comprised of enough samples will make the oscillations cancel each other.
More samples will make the bootstrap estimates and percentile estimates more precise; however, at the expense of increased computation times.
As most samples are wildtype for any given amplicon, multiple samples will make it easy to distinguish a mutation from the wildtype variation.
At a "true positive rate" of 99% (which means that only 1% of the cancer samples will be missed by the screen), the "false positive rate" is 22.2% (i.e., 22.2% of the benign samples will make it through the screen) on average for Data1 (Table 1), thereby reducing the workload of the pathologist by 4.5-fold.
The notes taken while making samples will make the hand-outs much easier to write.
If magnesium ratio of the samples are >50% of the water sample, it will make the water poisonous to plants (Rajmohan and Elango 2005).
Sample size will make a difference to the rates of multi- morbidity, with larger samples, all other methods being equal, resulting in more reliable estimates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com