Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
However, once this analysis began, the researchers found that, as a rule, hardly any of the documents included in the sample were likely to respond to the validated test guide.
Nearly 49% of black men in this sample were likely in prison in their lifetime, a risk ratio three times the national average of imprisonment for black men (14.09%, p < 0.01); and 22.2% of black women were likely in prison in their lifetime, which is 12 times the national average of imprisonment for black women (1.79%, p < 0.01).
There were significant differences in marital status between samples (X2 = 191.0, p<0.001): More people in the ADC sample were likely to be single compared to the NS sample who, in turn, were more likely to be single than those in the IC sample.
The authors were concerned that a large number of patients in the sample were likely to have complex heart disease, potentially leading to lower HRQOL scores and masking the SES effect.
From another perspective, some MSM in our sample were likely to have had access to HIV testing and prevention messages, and yet engaged in UAI during the past year.
These results suggest that the MEHP concentrations measured in this pooled sample were likely the result of contamination with DEHP or MEHP during or after collection (Holmes et al., in press).
Similar(54)
If they are different, then the sample is likely to be biased, and the results of the poll wrong.
Young African-American males are usually the hardest demographic to reach in political polling, and any that happen to be in the sample are likely to be upweighted because of their race, their gender, and their age.
But fully half your sample is likely to pipe up with the information that though they haven&apos t read Bennett himself, they have read Virginia Woolf's 1924 essay '&apos Mr.
Hence, the bias towards larger operations in our full sample is likely exaggerated.
Remember, every time we sample from a population, the values in the sample are likely to shift because of the random process of sampling.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com