Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Based on this small sample, we recommend that this technique be considered an alternative method for TFCC repair.
While this is expensive, given the many benefits of retaining a longitudinal sample, we recommend inclusion of this as a research cost for cohort and other repeat-contact studies.
This is expensive, however, given the many benefits of retaining a longitudinal sample, we recommend inclusion of this as a research cost for cohort and other repeat-contact studies.
Hence, while this study derived weights based on one sample, we recommend that a similar approach be applied in other samples including the original sample from the general population that was used to generate the uncorrelated summary scores [ 18, 19].
Similar(56)
For personal bioaerosol sampling, we recommend the use of a gelatin filter in combination with the IOM inhalable dust sampler at an airflow rate of 2 L/min.
Because of the variation in IBC recorded in BR-preserved samples, we recommend that BR should not be used for TBC determinations using the automated flow cytometry method.
Therefore, to determine the suitability of virus isolation for environmental samples, we recommend that future studies compare real-time RT-PCR positive RT-PCR positiveisolation rates in boto envirusmental swab and bisolationes.
Based on the high failure rate of PCD and the high success rate of surgical intervention in our samples, we recommend early surgical intervention with appropriate antibiotic treatment for the patients with gas-forming IPA.
In future studies with larger sample sizes, we recommend examination of the time window to determine whether samples collected closer in time (i.e., a 3-month window) are more strongly associated with the outcome measures than are samples collected more remotely.
Since the selection of the moments depends on distribution and sample size, we recommend h to be 1 and k to be 4.
With a binary or time-to-event outcome and a small sample size, we recommend the use of a stratified analysis using random effects, as this has been shown to maintain nominal type I error rates while giving high power.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com