Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
For each sample, we consider a set of attributes (e.g., speed and direction).
To shuffle the sample we consider two meadows of size n 1 and n 2 and we fill them randomly with the genets extracted from the original two meadows.
Although the Asn29His variant was associated with the disease in our sample, we consider SPTBN1 the more likely candidate in this region.
Because there is no clear indication that more than one species of Homo is represented in the Swartkrans sample, we consider all this material to belong to H. erectus.
For the lower surface of the sample, we constrain all displacements, u x = u y = u z = 0. Regarding the free upper surface of the sample, we consider the electrochemical potential of water and ions identical to those measured in the external bath, ε w = ε w *; ε+ = ε+*; ε− = ε−*.
While our strand bias test could not improve ShoRAH's raw SNV calls for the HIV sample, we consider the slight reduction in recall with σ = 0.0111 (two additional very low frequency true SNVs were classified as errors) to be an acceptable cost, compared to the potential benefits of the test.
Similar(54)
However, the size of the sample we considered may have affected the West African results at both regional and national levels.
We then performed 10 simulations of the germ-grain model with parameters (underline{p}) and for each simulated sample we considered one section out of two, like in the real material.
Yet, as age was negatively correlated with ToM performance in the bipolar sample, we considered it unlikely that the result of patients performing similarly to controls on neurocognitive and ToM tasks should be due to their higher age.
To obtain a sufficient sample, we considered a refractive error prevalence of 6% and assumed an accuracy of 3% with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%.
Therefore, in order to be consistent and to obtain a better reflection of the informal care costs in our sample, we considered informal care as a direct cost.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com