Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
The sample was split into two subsamples on random basis (n1 = 498, n2 = 497).
The sample was split almost evenly between grade 7 (48%) and grade 9 (52%).
In other words, the overall sample was split into three subsamples.
The sample was split into two parts applying manual force by hand to the cutting guide.
To address possible bias arising from an imperfect measure of quality, the sample was split by measures of quality.
This sample was split into two pieces; one was embedded into Polylite resin and the second one into KBr pellet.
The sample was split into three subsamples: an offspring sample, a candidate father sample and a candidate mother sample.
For patients with negative direct smear, a second sample was split, with SOC (raw sputum) and OM-S portions (sediment) tested in the Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay.
Human K3EDTA whole blood spiked with working solutions (at LQC and HQC level) were prepared and after spiking spiked sample was split into two aliquots (A and B).
To test for nonresponse bias issue, the sample was split into two groups based on the time of the collected responses (Sivo et al. 2006).
When the sample was split by sex, only for females were there significant correlations between delta palatability and: delta BW (r = .88); delta odor identification (r = .94); and delta TDI score (r = .85).85
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com