Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Methodological quality of our sample was poor; studies met roughly half of the applied criteria (mean ± sd, 54.7±18.4%).
In general, the correlation between FF and FFPE expression in a single sample was poor.
In our study, we found that agreement between self-reported and clinical and radiographic osteoarthritis diagnosis in our sample was poor (data not shown).
Indeed a survey of women initiated on either valproate or carbamazepine in the psychiatric department of three teaching hospitals over a twelve month period in England and Wales found that "standards of documentation regarding child bearing issues in this representative sample (was) poor" [ 19].
Similar(56)
Compared to the general population, our sample was poorer.
Fertilization to eyed-egg survival in the hatchery sample was poorest for eggs produced by Foreign females, whether crossed with a Foreign male (77.7%, SE = ±3.03) or Local male (81.5 ± 3.18%, most likely because Foreign ova were transported to the hatchery and therefore experienced extra handling.
Our results demonstrated that, in general, adherence and persistence observed with 5-ASA therapy in this sample were poor.
Regarding coping style, the majority of monitors in the Portuguese sample were poor sleepers, while all blunters slept well.
Conversely, if we adopt the intersection approach where being poor implies being deprived in all 17 dimensions, nobody in the sample is poor and <1% of the sample is deprived in 13.
Note that an FDR calculation would not be appropriate in the following cases: when another ChIP sample is used as a control; when the quality of the control sample is poor (e.g., many pseudobinding sites are identified); and when the ChIP sample has few peaks (e.g., <100 peaks) as shown in Peak assessment by DROMPA.
Moreover, correlation between QFI-PCR and Qubit by template 'functionality' for these samples was poor (R = 0.30).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com