Exact(5)
In conclusion, although a single urine sample was moderately predictive of 3-month exposure to phthalates, the predictive ability varied across phthalate monoesters.
An area under the curve (AUC) of.702 (.685-.719) in the ROC analysis of the total sample was moderately good (Table 3).
In support of the methodology we used in the present study, Hauser et al. (2004b) reported that a single urine sample was moderately predictive of each subject's exposure over a 3-month period.
Patients were recruited from Australian hospitals only, yet our sample was moderately large, and the inclusion of hospitals with different sizes and designations increases the generalizability of our findings.
Although we found both substantial day-to-day and month-to-month variability in each individual's urinary phthalate metabolite levels, a single urine sample was moderately predictive of each subject's exposure over 3 months.
Similar(55)
Specifically, treatment effects in our overall sample are moderately positive on average but mostly insignificant.
As most Australian universities require a certain level of English competency for admission to their academic courses/degrees (e.g. overall IELTS band score of 6.0, indicating a competent user), it may be that the language skills in the current sample were moderately high despite some respondents coming from non-English speaking backgrounds.
Other assumptions, such as that sample means and sample variances must be statistically independent, can be compensated when the sample is moderately large or larger, which is always the case for HCS.
The TRS monthly version item "impact on life" and the TRS monthly version total score (only done in the US, resulting in a smaller sample) were moderately correlated (0.23 ≤ r ≤ 0.48).
The average concentration of Fe in seep water samples was moderately lower than lake porewater (4,323 μg/l), but significantly lower for As (64.9 μg/l).
However, 18.8 % each of the groundwater samples were moderately hard and hard, while 20%% of the surface water samples were moderately hard.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com