Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
Each core biopsy and surgical sample was evaluated twice, four weeks between evaluations, by a single observer (QR) with the observer blinded to the relationships between samples.
The wettability of the as-grown sample was evaluated via the water contact angle (WCA).
The average crystallite size of the ZnO sample was evaluated as ~50 nm.
Each sample was evaluated for sperm ubiquitination by the direct immunofluorescence method, using anti-ubiquitin antibodies.
The crystalline structure of prepared sample was evaluated using by X-ray diffraction.
The absorption ratio of each fine aggregate sample was evaluated based on ASTM C128 (ASTM International 2015).
The forensic sample was evaluated by a single observer while the archaeological sample was independently scored by three different observers.
A minimum of 100 cells from each sample was evaluated for the presence or absence of membrane staining.
While Fe3+ ion reducing power of the sample was evaluated using varying extract concentrations (2.5 100 μg/mL) according to the method of Oyaizu [26].
This quantity of sample was evaluated as the best among various tested quantities for obtaining quantifications within the standard curve range and with acceptable PCR efficiency.
The crystallinity of the sample was evaluated using reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) and X-ray diffraction (XRD; Rigaku Smart Lab) with Cu Kα radiation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com