Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
The selection of the population-based sample was based upon having previously participated in the "New Generation Study" and having been deployed to OEF/OIF conflicts.
In England, the sample was based on 137 schools.
The weighting process of the postPIAAC sample was based on PIAAC guidelines (OECD 2013b).
Paper validation, i.e., deciding about the inclusion of a paper in the sample, was based on predefined criteria.
Therefore, we collected nine CI measurements for each irradiated sample, and the standard error for each irradiated sample was based on the three CI measurements of the subsamples.
Bootstrapping of any one sample was based on 1000 bootstrap samples a number that was found to give consistent results for the five examples.
The choice of this sample was based on the fact that it can be characterized precisely with other experimental procedures and therefore can represent the best benchmark for the determination of the method's validity.
The pollen sum of 17 samples was based on 300 grains, that of two samples was based on 400 grains, and that of one sample was based on 100 grains.
The sample was based on municipalities in the Municipal Basic Register in which at least 25 migrants were registered in that specific period; this concerned in total 26 out of 405 municipalities.
Because the sample was based on those who self-selected for participation rather than a sample based on probabilities, estimates of sampling error cannot be calculated.
The pattern of XCI for each sample was based on the analysis of allelic ratios of all informative loci.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com