Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
In the full sample, the risk of elevated HOMA-IR increased by ∼30% across PD quartiles.
In this longitudinal study of a large national sample, the risk of obesity at 5.5 years of age was not associated with maternal-infant relationship quality.
Among the other non-smoking profiles in the full sample, the risk of mortality was elevated by between 40%, for non-smoking, physically active, non-drinkers, and 90%, for non-smoking, inactive, non-drinkers.
Specifically, symmetric IUGR appears to be independent of preterm delivery due to PAH exposure in our African-American sample: The risk of symmetric IUGR was significant both among all African-American newborns and among those born full term.
Drawbacks of this technique include: the manual and individual processing of each individual sample, the risk of contamination, the risk of exposure of laboratory technicians to blood and the high cost [ 19].
Interestingly, although prescription opioid misuse is on the rise in North America, in our sample, the risk of HCV acquisition from injection of prescription opioids did not exceed that of traditional street drugs, including heroin, cocaine and crystal methamphetamine.
Similar(53)
In patients with consecutive FGFR3-positive urine samples the risk of developing a recurrence within 39 months was 90% [ 27].
However, they do not take into account the possible risk of a positive MTB culture sample being cross-contaminated with another positive sample, or the risk of a positive sample being contaminated with a (multi- drug resistant multi- drug
In the present study, the representativeness and size of our sample lowered the risk of sample selection bias.
When calculating sample size, the risk of bias when choosing a sample based on geographical clusters (communes) was considered.
Subgroup analyses, in which the strength or effect size of the association is compared between sample subgroups, have substantially less power to detect an association than the original intact sample, increasing the risk of false negative results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com