Sentence examples for sample proficiency from inspiring English sources

The movement of testing beyond reference lab introduced the need of quality control, including the implementation of an evaluation system for validating personal training and sample proficiency testing.

Laboratories at Mahidol University and CDC acted as reference laboratories by providing samples for proficiency testing among laboratories and for assembling and validating the evaluation panel.

WHO and other groups have also begun to provide test samples and proficiency panels that allow laboratories to assess their assays' performance and guidelines for specimen management to minimize the chance of contamination.

These samples consisted of real feed samples, if available or mixed samples of GeMMA proficiency tests and certified reference materials.

Therefore, I estimate the model for each migration trip and stratify the sample by English proficiency.

Fig. 4 Estimated baseline hazard for last migration sample by English proficiency.

Simulation of 20 reference cements in a modified Virtual Cement and Concrete Testing Laboratory produced compressive strength and heat of hydration results with mean absolute differences of 5.0%and6.5%5% compared to experimental data obtained from the same cements through the proficiency sample program of the Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory.

Briefly, each user extracted RNA from three FFPE breast tumor tissue samples to demonstrate proficiency in tissue processing, and each user processed four prototypical breast tumor RNA samples (one of each intrinsic subtype with known expected ROR score values) along with a negative control sample to demonstrate proficiency on the nCounter Analysis System.

Z-scores were calculated to evaluate trueness of quantitative analysis of USDA Proficiency test sample (0.29% sample), as if we would participate in December 2004 round of Proficiency testing, taking into account the results from other participating laboratories.

The method was applied in real samples and in proficiency tests and proved to be adequate for routine analysis.

Expert raters (n = 10) were purposively sampled and exhibited proficiency in their domain with creative works and scholarship accepted for juried and peer-evaluated national/international competitions.