Exact(1)
We compare these approaches on their finite sample performance by Monte Carlo.
Similar(59)
The only difference here being that the sample performance metric obtained by the mobile node is normalized instead of the threshold value, as can be seen in (5): Q n c i = W ber c i × ber min c i ber n + W del c i × del min c i del n + W jit c i × jit min c i jit n + W bw c i × bw n bw max c i. (5).
This lack of effect can be partly explained by sample performance homogeneity (Wiebe et al. 2008) or strict exclusion criteria (Waber et al. 2007), resulting in samples of healthy children with high IQ in spite of their unfavorable SES (Hackman et al. 2010).
Arellano and Bond (1991) estimated the finite sample performance of the proposed procedure by setting N = 100 and T = 7.
Ridge penalty (3) J λ (t ) = λ t 2 was originally developed to stabilize the sample performance of least square estimates by shrinking their absolute values toward zero [ 29].
We investigate finite sample performance of each of the estimators by varying the sample size within each unique simulation experiment.
Cohesion improves sample cutter performance by restricting the ability of different size fractions to move independently in the congested flow region that forms at the cutter opening.
The limited sample size, performance by a team of highly skilled clinician investigators, veterinarians, and pathologists, all thoroughly experienced in animal experimental research spanning from small and large sizes, and use of sophisticated equipments and devices may limit the external validity of our results.
For the bottom four primary sites with the smallest sample size, the performance by the model tended to be poorest.
Measurement of diclofenac, ibuprofen, and carbamazepine in water samples was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
The LA/MA detection in the urine samples was performed by high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection, as previously described [ 28].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com