Exact(7)
b The curve of OA obtained by different layers for the Salinas data set with different training sample percentages.
Fig. 4 a The curve of OA obtained by different training sample percentages for the Indian Pines data set.
ns for unweighted sample, percentages for weighted sample.
For each sample percentages of cells that were viable, early apoptotic, late apoptotic and necrotic were calculated (Illustrated in Additional file 2).
For categorical variables it was the difference between two sample percentages divided by the square root of one-half of the sum of sample percentage #1 × (1-sample percentage #1) and sample percentage #2 × (1-sample percentage #2).
For the total sample, percentages shown were calculated as proportion of the total sample (N = 575) and therefore the column totals for each variables will not add up to 100% if data was missing (see adjacent column with N and% Missing in total sample).
Similar(53)
Table 6 Percentage of dispersion (spot test method) of the lube oil sample and it is blends with additives after different oxidation times (h) Sample Percentage of dispersion time (h) 24 48 72 Blank 35 33 32 A1 80 81 93 92 67 A3 60 64 83 B1 85 89 92 B2 84 91 91 B3 82 88 91 88 93 92 67 A3 60 64 83 B1 85 89 92 B2 84 91 91 B3 82 88 91
Deep sequencing yielded reads corresponding to 2009 H1N1 influenza in each sample (percentage of aligned sequences corresponding to 2009 H1N1 ranging from 0.0011% to 10.9%), with up to 97% coverage of the influenza genome in one sample.
Two pathways are connected with each other based on their co-covered sample percentage; the width of each edge is proportional to the sample coverage percentage.
A sample size (n) of 2,400 was calculated to produce a two-sided 95% confidence interval ranging from 26.7% to 31.9% when the sample percentage (P) is 29.3%.
The following subject characteristics were coded: (a) the origin of the sample (school, community, university, or sport origin); (b) the mean age of the sample (in years), and (c) the gender distribution of the sample (percentage of males).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com