Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
We will test this assumption by assessing a sample of screen negative children.
All screen positives and a random sample of screen negatives were invited to SCID interview.
All screen positives and a random sample of screen negatives were invited to participate in a mental health assessment including a SCID interview.
As such information will be available for screen positive children, but for only a sample of screen negative children, these scores will have an artificially truncated distribution.
In stage 2, parents of children defined as screen positive (defined in Fig. 1) in stage 1 and a sample of screen negative children were interviewed according to the Development And Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA, http://www.Dawba.com) [ 17].
The families of children defined as screen positives in the first stage and a random sample of screen negative children were invited to participate in the second stage of the BCS, with a participation rate of 44%.
Similar(54)
The aim of this study was to estimate prevalence figures of common headache types, including migraine in a random sample of screen-positive individuals (i.e., those who said "yes" to the question whether they had suffered from headache during the last 12 months) as well as in screen-negative (i.e., individuals who answered "no" to this question) in two locations that were part of the HUNT 3 study.
In the second phase, persons who were screened positive for mental health or substance use problems, and a random sample of screen-negative persons were invited to a mental health interview.
Screen-positive children, and a sample of screen-negative children, were invited for a clinical and neurodevelopmental assessment using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-II) 21 or the Griffiths Tests, 22 or an alternative test if neither was available.
We selected a random sample of screening mammograms from a population-based breast cancer screening program.
We enrolled a consecutive convenience sample of screened patients by eligibility on weekdays only.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com