Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
If the laboratory sample is very large, the riffling process may be repeated several times.
In addition, sedimentation in the sample is very slow.
Prefundia's 71percentt success rate may sound impressive, but its data sample is very small.
The bulk density of the sample is very low (0.25 g/cm³) compared to the density.
This seems appropriate because the lithium excess in the sample is very small.
At low-temperature range, the recovery time of the sample is very large.
Moreover, the laser threshold of our hexagonal sample is very similar to that obtained for VPT.
From this pattern, it can be found that the obtained iron sample is very pure.
The Type I error in case of Altman original model on holdout sample is very high and close to 75%%.
The Cu2O shell which formed on the Cu powder sample is very thin, and the RSG is not large enough.
Similarly, the value of xylene (m&p) to n-octane of the sample is very low (0.31).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com