Put simply, the heavier the container, the denser the food sample was perceived to be.
The "mild" health state (mean utility 0.89 in the UK sample, 0.76 in the Swedish sample) was perceived as a condition which did not actually differ much from the participants' own reported health status (0.90 and 0.75 respectively).
In contrast, but again in both cases, the traceability of assumed interrelations, of the composition of individual scenarios and of the sample were perceived as rather low, at least by non-experts or externals, i.e., actors not directly involved into these activities.
We also tested if composites of symmetrical faces within each sample were perceived as being more sex-typical than composites of asymmetric faces.
The majority of patients in this community sample were perceived to be low risk for adverse outcomes.
One of the strongest associations and independent predictors of screening intention in our sample was perceived self-efficacy.
After pooling the risk levels into low-risk (a score of one or two), medium-risk (score of three) and high-risk (score of four or five) using the RISC, 4.3% of the total sample were perceived by their PHN to be at high risk of institutionalisation, 14.5% at high risk of hospitalisation, and 2.7% at high risk of death, within one year of the assessment.
Both samples were perceived to have the same creaminess and consistency intensity, but addition of long-chain inulin increased roughness intensity and, consequently, the sensory quality could be negatively affected.
This indicates that these samples are perceived as foreign, or stimulatory, by the human monocytes.
This indicates that the untreated bovine and porcine samples are perceived as foreign, or stimulatory, by the human cells.
