Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(12)
One PCR-positive sample in this group was also smear positive for fungus.
We note that the LCC sample in this group was classified as CAR by the second pathology review.
One sample in this group contained a coinfection of HAdV-5/HAdV-6.
Moreover, there were no statistically significant increase of the activities of CuZnSOD in erythrocytes obtained from non-WBCT control group after 10 days when compared to the initially taken sample in this group (p > 0.05) (Fig. 1; Table 3).
There was no statistically significant increase of the level of TBARS levels in the non-WBCT control group after 10 days in compare to the initially taken sample in this group (p > 0.05) (Fig. 1; Table 3).
There was also statistically significant increase of 6% of the activities of CuZnSOD in erythrocytes obtained from WBCT study group after 10 days of treatment, compared to the initially taken sample in this group (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1; Table 3).
Similar(48)
Group C, the moderately methylated group consisting of samples with any two regions methylated, was similar to Group D. The samples in this group compared to groups A and B had low mRNA expression (student's t test, p>0.05) and negative protein expression (p = 0.006).
The samples in this group exhibited similar shape of hysteresis loop with the first group but with slightly higher values of Ms and Mr. The H c values recorded for the samples prepared using pH 2 and pH 6 were 6005.8 and 5377.0 Oe respectively.
Interestingly, some tumor samples in this group showed increase in LINE-1 methylation.
The samples in this group also show very high aluminium concentrations (Fig. 1b).
McNemar's tests indicated four genera were also enriched in urine prior to adjustment for multiple sampling in this group: Pelomonas (p = 0.003, FDR = 16.70%), Propionibacterium (p = 0.004, FDR = 19.18%), Staphylococcus (p = 0.023, FDR = 60.69%), and Finegoldia (p = 0.023,FDR = 60.69%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com