Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
The cyclic polarization tests showed that all the tested sample groups were not susceptible to localized corrosion.
However, four differences between the two sample groups were found.
Statistical differences between the reference and the sample groups were evaluated by ANOVA (one way).
Random samples of Si from all sample groups were plotted against CH4.
The sample groups were also asked to describe the type of clothing that made them feel most confident.
The surface characteristics of the three sample groups were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM S-4300 Hitachi, Japan).
Finally, in order to evaluate the general effectiveness of the games, the mean value of the motivation gain and knowledge gain for both sample groups were calculated.
The adhesive system sample groups were the same for all tests: AdheSE™ (Ivoclar Vivadent, Barueri, SP, Brazil); Single Bond Universal™ (3 M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA); and Clearfil SE Bond™ (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan).
Four sample groups were used to summarize the data.
Comparisons between sample groups were performed using GeneSpring GX 9.0 software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA).
Raw data from the sample groups were compared using an independent 2-sample t-test with unequal variances.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com