Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Rarefaction to 3.5 million reads per sample, where the gene identity of each read was retained, revealed an average gene richness of 353833 ± 29279 for guinea pig faecal microbiome, while the corresponding richness of 402831 ± 89613 genes per faecal sample found for humans was significantly higher (P = 0.037, Additional file 1: Figure S1).
Similar(59)
In 2006, 244 (88%) RNs of the original sample were found for the follow-up assessment.
In our sample we found for the same scale the superior score of α = 0.82.
The most significant EAC association in our sample was found for rs2687201 followed by rs9837992 (P1-d.f. = 0.0007 and P1-d.f. = 0.002, respectively, Table 1).
The most significant differences between the samples were found for roughness and for the descriptors, reliable, natural and solid.
The ideal properties of the samples were found for the panels made having fibre length of 0.81 mm and aspect ratio of 23.4.
No significant effect of the time of sampling was found for N2O (Pillai's trace: F = 1.467, P = 0.199).
As can be seen from Table 2, significant differences between group means (Raphia vs. all other samples) were found for four of the minerals tested, sodium, calcium, manganese and zinc.
Positive samples were found for infants in 7 of 9 studied villages, indicating widespread prevalence.
No existing reliability studies with Brazilian samples were found for the HAM-D or the MADRS.
Conversely, no overall significant population genetic structure among samples was found for N. rossii ( = 0.032; = 0.009; P = 0.096).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com