Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Students were selected to create a high‐risk sample for smoking, although the study also included a random sample of students who had never smoked or who had tried smoking more than 12 months prior to screening.
It is remarkable that an interview on mood administered just once at age 36 years appears to impact on mortality more than two decades later, and indeed the effects sizes associated with psychiatric morbidity are on a par with those shown previously[ 24] in the same sample for smoking status.
Similar(58)
We performed a GWAS and candidate gene study investigating a variety of smoking behaviors with public health importance for the first time in a sample unselected for smoking behaviors and/or smoking attributable disease.
Based on previous experience sampling methods for smoking cessation [ 33], participants will be prompted six times per day to check-in, each day of the 22-day program.
The control group will receive experience sampling-only, to control for: (i) expectancy effects of treatment for smoking; (ii) non-specific effects of using a smartphone for smoking cessation; and (iii) potential effects of experience sampling for smoking cessation.
There was no difference in HBD2 production according to smoking habit at time of sampling in any disease group (two way ANOVA for smoking habit, p = 0.760).
When the sampling weights were not included, it overestimates the hazard for smoking.
The sample size for smoking is based on the assumption that 49.2% of the population with an increased COPD risk smokes [ 22].
These descriptive data from a nationally representative sample suggest that cadmium is related to cardiovascular outcomes even after adjustment for smoking status.
For instance, in Pakistani men, the sample sizes for smoking, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and tryglycerides were 423, 137 and 38, respectively.
Thank you for smoking.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com