Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
On receipt of the virology swab sample, the virology lab staff test the sample for common respiratory viruses using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays that have been extensively validated and quality assured for routine viral diagnosis.
Similar(59)
This chip contains 317 504 SNPs and provides ∼75% genomic coverage of the Utah CEPH (CEU) HapMap samples for common SNPs at r > 0.8 (31).
In order to determine yet unidentified disease-related genetic alteration in addition to the previously identified (WRN and LMNA), we screened differentially methylated gene promoters of the non-mutated samples for common regulatory mechanisms.
Analytical expressions for the relationship between variance, where it is controlled by short-range correlation, and sample size for common forms of the correlation coefficient are developed using an orthogonal (L1-metric) method of measuring distance.
Of the samples positive for common respiratory viruses, 33 were positive for rhinovirus only, 5 for FluV A only, 3 for RSV only, and 1 each for HCoV-OC43 and AdV only.
Bootstrap means and 90%and9595% CIs after small-sample corrections for common nationwide estimates of effects of pollutants represent associations with incremental changes in the 24-hr average concentration on the previous day of 10 μg/m for PM10; 10 ppb for O3, SO2, and NO2; and 1 ppm for CO.
Due to its hierarchical structure, sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials differ from sample size calculations for common RCTs [ 45, 46].
Sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials differ completely from sample size calculations for common RCTs [ 16, 17].
Individual variation in the secondary elytral reticulation was classified after the total sample was screened for common patterns.
The mean percentage of cyclin D1-positive nuclei was 7.75% for melanoma samples, 5% for dysplastic nevi samples, and 0.34% for common nevi samples.
We analyzed urine samples for five common pyrethroid metabolites.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com