Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The sample efficiency was determined in a series of template dilutions.
High average capture efficiency for the 4-plex, 10-plex, and 20-plex captures was consistently achieved (median: 70.3 %, 78.2 %, and 71.5 %), whereas the 1-plex capture sample efficiency was low (10%%).
Similar(58)
Sample efficiency is the ratio of the number of correlated plots to uncorrelated plots required to achieve the same level of precision [70].
Sample efficiency is the ratio of the number of correlated plots to uncorrelated plots required to achieve the same level of precision [ 70].
Sampling efficiency was improved over time via an iterative learning process by which past survey data was used to refine the stratification and allocation schemes of future surveys.
Sampling efficiency is a measure of the optimality of a sampling strategy.
Sampling efficiency is measured by monitoring the rate at which different conformations of the molecules' dihedral angles are visited, and by computing ergodic measures of some observables.
Different processes affecting the sampler efficiency were investigated specifically: breakthrough during sampling because of the surface passivation and loss of already collected mercury halides due to spontaneous reduction or due to the reaction with ozone.
Sampling efficiency is improved and minimal amount of computation is achieved by using the intermediate results obtained in particle allocations.
When analyzing small volumes, investigating rare events, and adapting to existing sampling schemes, it is desirable that sampling efficiency be well quantified and as high as possible without particles appearing in successive frames.
This dependence is not statistically significant for the GSP and Button Aerosol Sampler, whose sampling efficiencies are similar to each other and do not change with increasing test particle size at the indicated wind velocities.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com