Sentence examples for sample degree from inspiring English sources
Table 5 Similarity degree of community structures Metric Sample Degree of similarity FNCA vs. LPA Common Mean Median Std.
In our sample, degree of acceptance is quite high: 88.7% of the sample answered correctly to at least one question and 74.2% to both.
Table 2 Degree of crystallinity Sample Degree of crystallinity Cellulose 75 BTCA 2 wt% 55.7 BTCA 5 wt% 37.5 BTCA 8 wt% 36.5 CA 2 wt% 56.2 CA 5 wt% 44.0 CA 8 wt% 29.9.
Open image in new window Fig. 5 The XRD pattern of USY zeolite Table 3 Crystal structural parameters of USY zeolite Sample Degree of crystallinity (CRX/%) Cell parameters (a0/nm) Si/Al ratio CUSY 84.0 24.452 10.8 CFUSY 76.5 24.311 25.76.5
Table 1 Evaluation of ink's stability considering stability of blue wool standards (minimum 1, maximum 8) Sample Degree of stability at the maximal aging time of Light aging Thermal aging Thermal aging with NO 2 W 8 7 6 B 6 7 7 S 7 7 6 IGI 11 6 4 4 IGI 12 6 5 5. Folding endurance of the papers with sepia and bistre ink was very high during the light aging (Figure 3) (and thermal one, too).
I create an animal degree distribution by drawing a sample degree distribution for a sub-system with specified SA, SP and CB that has a MaxEnt degree distribution and then build a new degree distribution by connecting two copies of this sub-system by sharing the most general animal species.
We denote the sampled sequence {X i } as {D i } in this section, since the sampled degree sequence will be a case study in this section.
Data from 13 consumer studies were analyzed, differing in number of consumers, product category, number of samples, degree of difference among samples and number and type of descriptors in the CATA question.
The relative areas of the alkyl (45 to 0 ppm) and aromatic (160 to 110 ppm) components were summed to represent the proportion of hydrophobic C in the humic samples (degree of hydrophobicity, HB).
Figure 1a displays the sampled degree distribution, which showed strong over-dispersion.
Possible explanations for this wide range of upgrade rates include differences in the volume of tissue sampled, degree of pathologic radiologic correlation, and inclusion of other histopathology in the samples studied.
