sample damage

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "sample damage" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are referring to damage that is representative or indicative of a larger issue, often in testing or evaluation scenarios. Example: "The report highlighted the sample damage observed during the testing phase, which could indicate potential flaws in the product design."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Sample damage in conventional or guided STED.

Nature

We identified three major steps of sample damage caused by the STED laser.

Nature

In contrast, guided STED caused no apparent sample damage with laser powers up to 71 mW (Fig. 3).

Nature

Thanks to the relatively low power, excitation lasers could be safely employed to detect hemozoin without any sample damage.

Nature

To avoid sample damage during the probing step, the depletion laser is running at a very low power (pink).

Nature

First stages of sample damage, i.e. fluorophore bleaching, were observed only when the STED laser power exceeded 94 mW.

Nature

Guided STED prevented sample damage by switching off the STED laser in areas with high amounts of hemozoin.

Nature

Examples of three major stages of sample damage: A – altered hemozoin structure, B – damages of fluorophores in the proximity of hemozoin, C – hemozoin disintegration.

Nature

However, this evaluation is made irrespective of the presence of hemozoin, permitting strong illumination of hemozoin particles resulting in sample damage.

Nature

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

"In some cases taking a sample damages something that is really pristine," Ms. Nagy said.

The New York Times - Science

Samples of intact skin were collected from the infected salmon within the whole study period, however, it was not possible to sample damaged skin before 22 dpi (see Materials and Methods, Fig. 7).

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "sample damage", clearly specify the type of damage observed (e.g., "photobleaching", "structural failure") and the potential causes to provide a more informative and actionable analysis.

Common error

Avoid making broad statements about "sample damage" without providing specific details. Instead of saying, 'The sample showed damage', state, 'The sample exhibited signs of degradation due to prolonged exposure to air' to offer more clarity and context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sample damage" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes the state or condition of a sample that has been compromised. Ludwig AI shows it is used across a variety of scientific literature.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "sample damage" is a common and grammatically correct term used extensively in scientific literature to describe the compromised state of a sample. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is frequently found in contexts related to scientific research, underscoring its importance in assessing the reliability of experimental results. Effective communication about "sample damage" requires specifying the type and causes of the damage to ensure actionable analysis. When writing about this topic, avoid overgeneralizations and provide specific details to increase clarity. Alternative phrases, such as "specimen degradation", can be used to add nuance, but maintain precision in scientific discourse. To minimize "sample damage", remember to control experimental conditions and use appropriate handling techniques.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

specimen degradation

Focuses on the decline in quality or condition of a specimen.

material deterioration

Highlights the process of decline or decay in a material's properties.

sample corruption

Suggests the integrity of the sample has been compromised.

testing artifact

Refers to alterations or errors introduced during the testing process.

integrity loss

Highlights the compromise of the sample's original condition or purity.

experimental error

Emphasizes mistakes or inconsistencies that occurred during experimentation affecting the sample.

analyte instability

Specifically addresses the lack of stability of the substance being analyzed.

structural failure

Indicates a breakdown in the physical structure of the sample.

surface alteration

Refers to changes that occur specifically on the surface of the sample.

degradation effect

Focuses on the consequences of the sample's deterioration.

FAQs

How can I prevent "sample damage" during experiments?

To minimize "sample damage", control factors such as exposure time, laser power (if applicable), and environmental conditions. Use appropriate storage and handling techniques to maintain sample integrity.

What are the common causes of "sample damage"?

Common causes include exposure to light, heat, air, physical stress, and contamination. The specific causes vary depending on the sample type and experimental conditions.

What is the difference between "sample damage" and "specimen degradation"?

"Sample damage" is a general term for any harm to a sample, while "specimen degradation" specifically refers to a decline in the quality or condition of a specimen, often over time.

What kind of techniques minimize "sample damage" during imaging?

Techniques such as using low laser power, shorter exposure times, and specialized imaging modes (e.g., tapping mode in AFM) can minimize "sample damage". Also, consider using cryo-electron microscopy to preserve samples at very low temperatures.