Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
A 25.95 % reduction in terms of reimbursement was also observed, since the number of re-treatments in the sample considered is higher without intraprocedural CEUS and, therefore, the considered treatments and DRGs are higher in this scenario.
0.28 0.52 0.20 0.11 0.48 0.19 Robust standard errors in parentheses *** p<.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 Notes: The sample considered is the overall working age population (15‐64) employed at the time of the interview.
0.28 Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 Notes: The sample considered is the overall working age population (15‐64) employed at the time of the interview.
Similar(57)
The observation is limited to one OFDM symbol, and the number of samples considered is M then P = M.
A comparison of socio-demographic variables between the three samples considered is presented in Table 1. a χ test, except for age (ANOVA).
Total samples considered were 44 000 for Rwanda, 33 500 for Senegal and 33 400 for Uganda.
The best-fit parameters for the volume fraction of Au in EMA layers and effective thickness for various samples considered are listed in Table 1.
Haplotypes with frequencies <3% in the whole sample were considered be to be rare and excluded.
Another caveat to consider is sampling error.
The sampling methods we consider are the following: Sampling 1: Sampling of co-presence times.
The sample considered here was composed of 18 male and 18 female individuals (Additional file 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com