NBC executives argue that, as a result of the changed statistical sample, comparisons to last season's ratings are skewed.
Thus, we decided to use expression ratios of pairwise sample comparisons to reassess the data correlations.
We have used detection of rare but expected populations, combinations of artificial mixtures, and sample comparisons to provide external criteria for evaluating SWIFT performance.
Here we exploit this dual-sample comparison to frame a systematic interrogation of the functional interrelationships between ILC and IDC tumor parameters.
Detail of sampling, comparison to population, and retention rates are provided in the study website.
For each feature, we employed two-sample comparisons to test whether the feature score distribution of ES-up genes is significantly different from the distribution of ES-down genes.
Tools have been added to facilitate downstream sample comparison and to assess the distribution of biological functions (through a remote query to PANTHER [33]) among the identified proteins in a sample.
Interestingly, sample comparison of promastigotes to axenic amastigotes resulted in only 17 genes (0.2%) that meet the same statistical criteria for differential regulation.
A sample comparison of orthologs to selected E. coli paralogous groups correlates with known physiological and taxonomic relationships between the organisms.
In contrast there was little change in the distribution of kinetoplast DNA content in the induced sample in comparison to the uninduced sample and the wild-type.
The read counts for miR-126 also showed significantly lower number of counts for the necrotic sample in comparison to the unaffected sample.
