While values in bacterial DNA were higher in sewage, in phage DNA the average and also inter-sample comparison showed that some samples of sewage presented lower values than river water samples.
One sample comparison is shown in Fig. 7(a).
The preliminary comparison showed the superiority of the glass sampling bulbs for 2-AA.
Two-sample t-test comparisons showed that the counts in the Experimental group were also significantly higher than those of the normal saline Control group at 24 hrs (p<0.03) and 96 hrs (p<0.05).
Between-sample read count comparisons showed some evidence of batch effects across N2 embryos, primarily at the level of sequencing lane.
Although most goodness-of-fit indices suggested that the three-factor model and the bifactor model were equivalent, the sample-size adjusted BIC comparisons showed that the bifactor model (ssABIC 102,077) was favoured over the three-factor model (ssABIC 102,753, Δ -676).
As in the present sample, comparison of all cord bloods showed a significant decrease in adduct levels in 2005 (unpublished data).
These comparisons showed how using complete data affected the composition of the sample.
Three-way comparisons showed that Hfx.
In addition, correlation coefficients were determined in a sample-by-sample comparison, and results showed that mRNA levels in single sample pairs (fresh-frozen and FFPE) were maintained across the sample pairs when using NanoString technology.
Figure 2 shows a sample comparison between the modeled and the measured water depth at LZ40.
