Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The 16 record test sample also gave us preliminary information needed to determine that the final sample size of 50 records would be adequate to show significant changes in our major measures.
Similar(59)
This sample also gives 84% power to detect an effect size of 0.5 on the patient medical communication self-efficacy scale (PEPPI).
Repeated analyses of basalt (JB-2) and coral (JCp-1) samples with 0.6 1.2 ng of Nd after processing with low-blank Nd separation chemistry designed for small samples also gave 143Nd/144Nd values consistent with those given by large-sized sample analyses, and the external precisions were comparable to the JNdi-1 analyses.
The 2 min-fluorinated graphite samples showed the higher charge capacities than original graphite by about 5 10%, that is, 380 400 mA h g−1 and the half of 10 min-fluorinated graphite samples also gave the high charge capacities of about 380 mA h g−1.
Our bicelle samples also gave interesting spectra under magic-angle spinning; see section 10.
Additionally, phylogenies with a large number of markers and a complete taxon sampling also gave rise to the same conclusions [ 11, 13, 14].
Also, the level of nuclear structuring we observed was too low to cause a substantial artifact due to sample pooling (and separate analyses for each of the local samples also gave positive Tajima's D values).
Addition of antibiotics to control samples also gave a low oil yield (4%). Incubation of preheated kernel slurry with crab paste and antibiotics significantly improved the oil yield to 62%.
Conventional RT-PCR yielded similar results but with several other samples also giving amplicons near the expected molecular weight.
Incubation of the solution of sample 3 at 37 °C for about 48 72 h did give rise to some thin fibrillar deposits similar to those seen with sample 1. Sample 6 also gave PPL deposits on the grids.
This sample size also gave 0.80 probability for detecting one or more adverse events that occurred with a probability of 0.15 per volunteer.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com