Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Apart from subjects edentulous in one or both jaws (8% of the total sample), a majority (76%) had at least ten teeth in each jaw.
Similar(59)
The cost of misclassifying a minority sample as a majority sample is always set 1.0.
Nevertheless, the impact of this issue is particularly tremendous in medical data analysis because the cost of misclassifying a minority sample as a majority sample, e.g., patients miss the chance to be cured if they fail to be identified and diagnosed due to the wrong classification, is highly expensive and sometimes unaffordable.
Anyone who claims to have sampled a majority of this year's new games is either a liar or a shut-in.
Regarding priority considerations for HPV self-sampling, a majority (n = 234, 78.8%) was concerned about cost.
There were some commonalities between the five studies with relatively high retention rates: all used highly motivated and/or self-select samples; a majority were intended as multiple exposure interventions ranging from 2 to 6 months [ 19, 22, 27, 29] and a majority offered incentives to participants [ 19, 22, 23, 27].
In our study, we monitored the expression of the PAX6 gene in 6 medulloblastoma cell lines and 14 medulloblastoma primary tumor samples: a majority of the cell lines showed moderate expression levels of PAX6 with the exception of the PFSK-1 and D283 cell lines (p = 0.015).
Let us assume that participants adopt such a grouping (sampling) strategy and search for a congruent sample with a majority grouping size.
Although the sample was a majority (66%) of all eligible patients overall, the sample size achieved was lower than expected for the initiation group but higher for the maintenance group and is unexplained.
Demographic data in our RCVS patients recaptured an obvious pattern reported in other studies with larger sample sizes: a majority of older female and a minority of younger male patients.
For instance, our sample included a majority of female patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com