Exact(22)
The ABTS radical scavenging activity was calculated as (4) S % = A control − A sample A control × 100.
The degree of DPPH radical scavenging activity of MH was calculated as a percentage of inhibition (% inhibition) where (1) % inhibition = A control − A sample A control × 100.
The DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated according to the following equation: (1) % DPPH radical scavenging activity = [ 1 − (A sample A control ) ] × 100, where Asample and Acontrol are absorbance of the sample and control.
Cell viability was calculated using the following: (1) Cell viability % = A sample A control × 100%%, where Asample and Acontrol are the absorbance from the mixture with and without the addition of test sample, respectively.
The results for percentage viability, apoptosis, lipid peroxidation and GSH depletion were expressed relative to the negative control using the following equation: Parameter % = A sample A control × 100 where, A(control) = intensity of triplicate negative control; A sample) = triplicate intensity of sample at a given concentration.
The scavenging ability was calculated using the following formula: (6) scavenging ability % = 1 − A sample A control × 100, where Acontrol is the absorbance of control without the polysaccharide sample and Asample is the absorbance in the presence of the polysaccharide sample.
Similar(38)
The percentage of DPPH decolourization of the sample was calculated as DPPH · scavenging effect % = Control A – Sample A / Control A × 100 Where Control A is the absorbance of the control reaction.
Cell proliferation or cell growth was determined as a percentage of the vehicle control by an equation of; % Cell Proliferation = control A ‒ sample A / control A × 100.
Cylinders without added antibiotic (sample A) served as controls.
For the cell viability assay, a nanodisk containing sample and a control sample was prepared as described above.
We'll also do randomized experiments where we take a test sample and a control sample and do a particular treatment to one group and see how the purchasing or voting behavior is different between the two.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com