The identified parameter values are found consistent for the trials conducted under same test conditions.
The logic is that null events are (at least on average) embedded within the same past and future trial conditions as a regular event, and thus have the same preceding and succeeding average BOLD signal.
The lists had the same trial sequence in terms of conditions and differed only in the variants of targets and of probes.
The control condition is a mock-up focusing on severe mental illness accessed through the same trial website.
Acquitted of rape at the same trial.
The procedure for Session B was the same as the second part of Session A (training), except that there were a total of 16 conditions (2 reward conditions x 8 trial conditions) run in separate blocks of trials.
These values were averaged separately for the different trial conditions (same/different location) and for the sequential position of the target object.
Although the significance of performance was predetermined 66% correct, the elephants were given the same condition trials until their performance met the predetermined criterion, i.e. above 75% correct in one condition (38/50 trials, binomial test: P = 0.0003, two-tailed), then the elephant proceeded to the next condition, and so forth, in alphabetical order (A B C D).
In the Same condition, trials consisted of symmetrically bisected lines, with two equal segments of 70 mm each.
The presence of trial-over-trial depression in conditions that lack same-trial facilitation, albeit with a slightly different time course, implies that trial-over-trial depression is caused partly by plasticity of simple-spike firing that is linked to CS responses.
As all prisons are supplying both control and intervention subjects half the number of prisons (and therefore half the logistical problems) are needed to supply the same number of individuals as a cluster randomized trial under the same power conditions.
