Exact(24)
The same interference pattern demonstrated in Young's double-slit experiment is produced when a beam of matter, such as electrons, impinges on a double-slit apparatus.
It was thought for a time that one photon passing through A might interfere with another photon passing through B. That possibility was ruled out after the British physicist Geoffrey Taylor demonstrated in 1909 that the same interference pattern can be recorded on a photographic plate even when the light intensity is so feeble that only one photon is present in the apparatus at any one time.
We assume the same interference factor for all repeaters to simplify this analysis, that is,.
In cases 3, 4, and 5, the channels with different parameters but the same interference tolerances are selected.
A particular case is represented by the unit disk graph model, which assumes homogeneous readers, with the same interference range.
In other words, the co-channel interference generated by the secondary users is the same interference generated by the primary users.
Similar(36)
Two interferences, which have the same interference-to-noise ratio (INR) of 30 dB, are impinging on the array from directions -30° and 50°, respectively.
The generalized degrees of freedom (GDoF) of the symmetric Gaussian K-user interference channel were studied in [33], where all direct links have the same SNR and all cross-links have the same interference-to-noise ratio (INR).
Preliminary studies in METIS show that without using any ICIC schemes or interference cancellation, there are limited gains in using MNs to serve VUEs in densely deployed urban scenarios ([45] pp. 33), because the MNs are operating mostly at the same interference-limited scenario as regular outdoor UEs.
Thus, users in the cell of interest will be affected by the same interferences from adjacent cells during all hops.
They are calculated from different parameters (SUVA254 using low wavelength adsorption and DOC concentration; FI using a ratio of higher wavelength fluorescence and is independent of DOC) and are often evaluated together, because FI is not subject to the same interferences as SUVA254 (e.g., Fe concentration).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com