Sentence examples for same evidence for from inspiring English sources

Despite the unknowns, officials in all three nations cite the same evidence for the new dominance of Colombian and Mexican heroin: rising seizures, higher purity, falling prices.

For if rationality is a matter of responding correctly to one's evidence, then the judgement that the thinker is equally rational in the good case and the bad case would seem to require that the thinker has the same evidence for his beliefs in both cases.

And, finally, in United States v. Randenbush (1834 where the defendant had first been acquitted of counterfeiting one note, and then convicted of counterfeiting a different note (which had been introduced as evidence at the first trial)—the Court held that double jeopardy did not run from the use of the same evidence for "entirely a distinct offence".

Although male circumcision has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition among heterosexual men [ 6], there is not the same evidence for MSM [ 7]; a finding recently supported by our own data [ 8].

Furthermore, when compared with the alternative of applying the same evidence standards for pharmaceuticals to medical devices, the CSP policy offers improved financial incentives for medical device companies.

Innocent people have been convicted and imprisoned on the "evidence" of recovered memory testimony, even though this is the exact same "evidence" we have for alien abduction, and is the same "therapeutic" process by which people practice "past life regression".

For example, suppose I have adequate evidence for the claim that Anne has two brothers, then it would seem that the very same evidence would be adequate for believing that Anne has at least one brother.

Most trading algorithms respond to the same evidence people do, selling, for instance, if they recognize certain triggers.

In order to put some balance in this argument the evidence for such behaviour in Australia is examined in terms of landscape burning, hunting and the archaeological record, the same evidence is also examined for Southeast Asia.

Thus, even when two people share the same evidence, it is permissible for one to adopt one doxastic attitude toward a proposition and for the other to adopt a different attitude (also see Pettit 2006).

With respect to EByou−P, P is epistemically improbable; after all, you have the same evidence as the jury for ¬P, and the jury is quite properly (if mistakenly) convinced that you did the crime.