Sentence examples for s variables from inspiring English sources

On the other hand, R and S variables have meaningful impact on b∗ and a quadratic model is consistent with the experimental data.

Due to the (CQ) condition, the constrained least-squares problem (13a - 13b) can be reformulated as an unconstrained least squares problem by parametrization of the s variables.

Where d f is the f th variable of a total number of S variables including household characteristics and a variable for month and year.

The reduced state z can now be used for reducing the number of variables in the flow equation, so that we have only l = l p  + l s variables instead of 2N c.

end{aligned} Projecting onto the s variables results in begin{aligned} {C}_{s} & = bigl[textstylebegin{array}c@{quad}c@ 0 & mathbb{I} end{array}displaystyle bigr] {C}_{v} begin{bmatrix} 0 mathbb{I} end{bmatrix} & = bigl(F^{-1} E bigr) {C}_{p} bigl(F^{-1} E bigr)^{T} & = tilde{ {C}}_{s}.

The time-scale splitting of the "fast" ( v, m, h, n ) and "slow" ( w, s ) variables away from the fold F − does not hold anymore in a neighborhood of the fold F −. Without this time-scale splitting, and thus the identification of a singularly perturbed problem, regular GSPT analysis does not yield a reliable prediction of system dynamics.

Figure 1 S variable: susceptible population.

In the actual response calculations the Gaver-Stehfest algorishm is employed for inverting the transcendental functions of the complex s variable.

Four values are compared to those predicted by neutral theory: S variable (SV), S invariable (SI), NS variable (NSV), and NS invariable (NSI) mutations.

To determine whether the relationships between the dependent (ΔI0 30/ΔG0 30 or incAUCins/glu) and independent (1/fasting insulin or HOMA-S) variables were consistent with a rectangular hyperbola (x × y = constant), we estimated ln ΔI0 30/ΔG0 30 or incAUCins/glu) as a linear function of ln(1/fasting insulin or HOMA-S) using regression analysis.

The three GAF variables did not differ significantly; however, both SumGAF and GAF-S variables were significantly higher than effect and cost-effectiveness (5%).> -wrap-foot> A two-way random model (2.1) absolute agreement, between 42 individual raters over 20 referrals.