Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(33)
RW: I think they're entitled to their view.
RW: I suppose I really wonder why you're so angry.
RW: I think he's entitled to believe it as a human being.
RW: I think his reasoning is not relevant to the sequencing of the human genome, which is what he's famous for.
(P1) is a deontic principle of non-contradiction (RW IV, 264 f).; (P2) is the principle that "ought implies permitted" (RW I, 236); (P3) is a kind of combination principle for ought (RW I, 229 f).; (P4) is the "ought implies can" principle (RW I, 230, 257, RW IV, 214, and WL II, 348); and (P5) is a deontic entailment principle (RW I, 229, WL II, 339, 348).
RW: I must say Phil Jagielka has been doing a wonderful job for Everton and for his country.
Similar(27)
ATG15 have addressed the importance of a wave-induced scalar quantity and symbolized it as Λ: it vanishes for mid-latitude IGWs (i.e., waves with no perturbation of EPV) and becomes nonzero for mid-latitude RWs (i.e., wave with a perturbation of EPV).
The tokens included two RWs (i.e., "baby muppet"/bebi mʌpɪt/ and "peppy mama muppet"/p εpi mam ə mʌpɪt/) and two NWs (i.e., "babu mepid"/bᴂb ə m εpɪd/ and "bebu pupu bepid"/bɛb ə pʌp ə bɛpɪd/), which were presented in a randomized order in terms of word type (RW versus NW) and length (four versus six syllables).
RW A I cannot be entirely certain without a bit more detail but it sounds to me as if Abbey could be in breach of the banking code here.
RW A I can't be entirely certain without a bit more detail, but it sounds to me as if Abbey could be in breach of the banking code here.
RW: Basically, I'd find the artists and invite them.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com