ruthless competition for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "ruthless competition for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a highly aggressive and unyielding rivalry in various contexts, such as business, sports, or any competitive environment. Example: "In the tech industry, there is ruthless competition for market share among leading companies."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

WITH its many tournaments and ruthless competition for prizes, classical music sometimes seems intent on becoming more like a sport than an art form.

The Economist

This environment could lead both to protectionism and to ruthless competition for exports to third-country markets, regardless of the effect on proliferation or international stability.One of the hardest questions that defence analysts are debating over the proposed EADC is whether it will ease or exacerbate this "platform envy".

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

That natural selection is a natural process in the living world has been taken by some as a justification for ruthless competition and for "survival of the fittest" in the struggle for economic advantage or for political hegemony.

Encyclopedia Britannica

After opening at $24, the company's lackluster user growth numbers and ruthless competition from Facebook has left the company trading below $11 currently.

TechCrunch

Work can be an arena of scheming and back-stabbing, of ruthless competition and jockeying for power.

The New York Times

It conceals a great modesty that I propose to reveal by mentioning the innumerable examples of great pianists, violinists or conductors who would not be where they are had they not miserably failed their primary vocation, the dream of an entire lifetime shattered by ruthless competition: the position of music critic for a daily newspaper.

Huffington Post

Yet, its up-to-the-minute veneer features ruthless competition and sexual freedom.

The New York Times - Arts

Science would benefit more from a harmonious coexistence of its members than by favouring ruthless competition.

The Guardian

"Business ethics have changed in Slovakia," she said, citing corruption in the judiciary and more ruthless competition.

The New York Times

Social Darwinism was in full flower, with its emphasis on ruthless competition and survival of the fittest.

The New York Times

You mention a factor in the decisions of many schools not to rank: the ruthless competition that develops among students.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "ruthless competition for" to vividly depict situations where the intensity and lack of consideration are key aspects. For example, "The tech startups faced "ruthless competition for" funding."

Common error

Avoid using "ruthless competition for" in casual conversations or informal writing, as its intensity might be disproportionate to the situation. Consider more moderate alternatives like "strong competition" or "healthy rivalry" in less serious scenarios.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ruthless competition for" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as a subject or object in a sentence. It describes the nature of competition, emphasizing its intensity and lack of consideration. As shown in Ludwig, this phrase is used to depict environments characterized by aggressive rivalry.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "ruthless competition for" is a noun phrase that accurately describes situations involving intense and often aggressive rivalry. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability across various contexts, although it is more suited for formal or neutral registers. While alternatives like "cutthroat competition for" and "fierce rivalry for" exist, "ruthless competition for" effectively conveys the uncompromising nature of such scenarios. Use it judiciously to accurately reflect the intensity of the competition you are describing, and avoid overuse in overly casual settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cutthroat competition for

Replaces "ruthless" with "cutthroat", emphasizing the merciless nature of the competition.

ferocious competition for

Replaces "ruthless" with "ferocious", intensifying the feeling of the competition.

fierce rivalry for

Substitutes "ruthless competition" with "fierce rivalry", focusing on intense antagonism.

intense struggle for

Replaces "competition" with "struggle", highlighting the effort involved.

dog-eat-dog competition for

Emphasizes the aggressive and self-serving aspect of the competitive environment.

aggressive rivalry for

Replaces "ruthless competition" with "aggressive rivalry", focusing on the assertive nature of the competition.

unrelenting battle for

Replaces "competition" with "battle", stressing the continuous nature of the conflict.

vigorous contention for

Substitutes "ruthless competition" with "vigorous contention", highlighting active and forceful striving.

brutal contest for

Replaces "ruthless" with "brutal" and "competition" with "contest", underscoring severity.

sharp competition for

Replaces "ruthless" with "sharp", suggesting the competition is incisive and keenly felt.

FAQs

How can I use "ruthless competition for" in a sentence?

You can use "ruthless competition for" to describe situations where there is intense and often aggressive rivalry for a particular resource or goal. For example, "There is "ruthless competition for" scholarships among students."

What are some alternatives to "ruthless competition for"?

Alternatives include "cutthroat competition for", "fierce rivalry for", or "intense struggle for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What distinguishes "ruthless competition for" from "strong competition for"?

"Ruthless competition for" implies a lack of compassion or consideration in the pursuit of a goal, whereas "strong competition for" simply suggests a high degree of rivalry without necessarily implying unethical or harmful behavior.

Is "ruthless competition for" appropriate for formal writing?

Yes, "ruthless competition for" is suitable for formal writing when describing scenarios where the competitive environment is indeed exceptionally aggressive and uncompromising.