Sentence examples for rules of reasoning from inspiring English sources

As compared with definitory rules, strategic rules of reasoning have received relatively scant attention from logicians and philosophers.

In order to study good reasoning from the perspective of efficiency or success, strategic rules of reasoning must be considered.

Trafficking in irresponsible inferences and unsupported conclusions, the filmmaker Brent Leung offers himself as suave docent through a globe-trotting pseudo-investigation that should raise the hackles of anyone with even a glancing knowledge of the basic rules of reasoning.

In dispensing with the complexity, Genesereth can explain the differences between various forms of reasoning and introduce the fundamental rules of reasoning, and teach this mental discipline to students who would not traditionally have had access to these thinking tools.

This is, in fact, one of the major assumptions behind Hume's own Rules of Reasoning.

On the third account, psychology is essential to the justification of the rules of reasoning.

Hume appears to have assimilated the importance of Newton's third rule of reasoning (see section 4.5 below).

In the section on Hume's Rule of Reasoning (4.5), the significance of the absence of an equivalent to Newton's rule 4 in Hume's thought is explored.

This echoes Newton's second rule of reasoning,[5] especially in its generalizing tendency, which Newton explicitly asserts in his third rule.[6] That is to say, in his fourth rule, Hume makes explicit what is implied by the simplicity of nature assumption in Newton's first rule:[7] that the same cause always produces the same effect.

These answers opened the way to pursing the true motions in a sequence of successive approximations, in the process of which continuing evidence could be brought to bear on the theory, potentially delimiting its exactness and its universal applicability in the manner Newton had noted in his fourth rule of reasoning.

Still, it is worth noting that the conclusion Clairaut first drew from the factor of 2 discrepancy in the motion of the lunar apogee was not that Newton's theory of gravity was false, but that the inverse-square needed to be supplemented by a 1/r4 term — a response fully in keeping with Newton's fourth rule of reasoning.