Sentence examples for rules of proceedings from inspiring English sources

The constitution empowers each house to determine its rules of proceedings.

Specifically, the justices said that while "the Constitution empowers each house to determine its rules of proceedings, [i]t may not by its rules ignore constitutional restraints or violate fundamental rights".

Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution states: "Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings".

Their reasoning is a non sequitur: The Constitution empowers each chamber to "determine the rules of its proceedings".

Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution grants the Senate control to "determine the rules of its proceedings".

The fact that the Senate "may determine the Rules of its Proceedings" does not mean that the rules of the Senate are the highest law of the land.

These cases foundered against Article I, Section 5, of the Constitution, which says that each house of Congress "may determine the Rules of its Proceedings".

Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution states that "each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings" at the beginning of the new Congress.

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

With precision timing – as the country looks back over 13 years of New Labour's attempted inroads into fundamental rights – three of the country's most senior judges stated unanimously that the courts simply cannot tamper with the basic rules of civil proceedings, just because it's convenient for the government to do so.

Although the meaning and nature of the proceeding may differ, the arrival in a commercial court which registers the cessation of payments gives a simple criterion to 'objectively' separate two classes of firms: those that are governed in accordance with the rules of collective proceedings and those which are still operating in an economic world dominated by the respect of contractual commitments.