Sentence examples for rules of ownership from inspiring English sources

The rules of ownership are also governed by race.

If the rules of ownership are construed too narrowly, then the present arguably pays too little respect – in the form of money – to the future.

If these rules of ownership are construed too broadly – with too much control permitted to someone upstream – then anyone with the misfortune of coming along later risks trouble from those who came before.

"The Boke of St. Albans," written by Dame Juliana Berners, the prioress of the Sopwell Nunnery, in St. Albans, in 1486, records the rigid rules of ownership: an aspiring birder risked having his hands cut off if he kept a bird above his social station; destroying a falcon's eggs was punishable by a year in prison; anyone who poached a falcon from the wild risked having his eyes gouged out.

On his view, human beings can create a society without government, ordered by conventional rules of ownership, transfer of property by consent, and promise-keeping.

Greed, and more broadly, self-interest, is the motive for inventing property; but we need a further explanation why we think of justice (adherence to the rules of ownership) as virtuous, and injustice (their violation) as vicious.

Consequently, we are not persuaded to transplant the Pollard rule of ownership as an incident of state sovereignty in relation to inland waters out into the soil beneath the ocean, so much more a matter of national concern.

But his membership in this exclusive fraternity of billionaires would violate the first rule of ownership: protect the bottom line.

Since the rules on ownership of radio were last relaxed in 1996, the two biggest companies went from owning 130 stations to more than 1,400.

After endless legal battles, the publishing industry succeeded in persuading Congress to pass the Copyright Act of 1976, which defined "fair use" of copyrighted material and sought to establish a set of rules for ownership of content.

3. Does IAG's structure respect point 37 6) of the rules on ownership, and more precisely does it guarantee that 'all shares involved carry the same voting rights'?