rule with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "rule with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the manner or style in which someone governs or leads, often implying a certain authority or approach. Example: "The king chose to rule with an iron fist, ensuring that his commands were followed without question."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"You cannot rule with this Parliament.

The New York Times

It's like the rule with earthquakes.

The New Yorker

"I didn't rule with an iron fist.

The New York Times - Sports

(She also breaks the no-smiling rule, with dire consequences).

The New York Times

In practise they have established their rule with the gun.

The Guardian

Then you can rule with an iron fist.

The Guardian - Money

We're dealing with family rule with fatal flaws".

The New York Times

German airlines introduced the rule with immediate effect on Friday.

The Guardian

The main rule with a charcoal barbecue is: don't rush.

Independent

Doesn't rule with as hard an iron fist.

The New York Times - Sports

Could Mr Schüssel rule with a minority in parliament?

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "rule with", ensure that the preposition complements the noun that follows. For example, "rule with an iron fist" or "rule with compassion".

Common error

Avoid using "rule with" in contexts where collaboration or shared decision-making is emphasized. The phrase often implies a hierarchical power dynamic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "rule with" functions as a verb phrase indicating the manner or style in which authority is exercised or governance is conducted. It's about how someone rules, not simply that they rule. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase’s correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "rule with" is a grammatically sound and usable expression to describe a mode of governance or leadership. Ludwig AI validates its correctness. It is most commonly found in News & Media, Scientific articles and Formal Business communications. When using "rule with", ensure that the preposition complements the noun that follows in order to avoid misinterpretation. The phrase's connotations should also be considered. Alternatives such as "govern with" or "lead with" may better suit certain contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

govern with

Focuses more generally on the act of governing, without necessarily implying a specific style or method.

lead with

Emphasizes guidance and direction, rather than strict control.

administer with

Suggests a more structured and procedural approach to managing affairs.

control with

Highlights the aspect of maintaining power and authority.

dominate with

Implies a stronger, perhaps even oppressive, form of power.

exercise authority with

More formal and emphasizes the act of using one's official power.

wield power with

Suggests a conscious and deliberate application of influence.

manage through

Focuses on the process of achieving goals via specific management techniques.

command using

Emphasizes the issuance of orders and the means by which they are enforced.

oversee with

Indicates a supervisory role, focusing on ensuring operations are carried out effectively.

FAQs

How can I use "rule with" in a sentence?

You can use "rule with" to describe the manner in which someone governs or exerts authority, such as "The dictator chose to rule with fear".

What are some alternatives to "rule with"?

Depending on the context, you could use "govern with", "lead with", or "manage with" as alternatives.

What does it mean to "rule with an iron fist"?

To "rule with an iron fist" means to govern in a strict and authoritarian manner, showing little tolerance for dissent.

Is it appropriate to use "rule with" in a business context?

Yes, but be mindful of the connotation. Using phrases like "rule with innovation" or "rule with integrity" can be effective if you wish to describe a company that excels in those domains. Conversely avoid it if collaboration is more relevant that top-down control.