Sentence examples for rsv data from inspiring English sources

We consider timeliness of RSV reports to EISS as well as the collection of both sentinel and hospital-based RSV data by age group important for RSV surveillance.

We examined the timeliness of RSV data entry into the EISS database by investigating whether data on RSV were included in the EISS Weekly Electronic Bulletin and compared this to the timeliness of influenza data.

The Fab competitions were also confirmed on immobilized inactivated RSV (data not shown).

However, previously studies suggest that estimates including or excluding RSV data did not significantly affect influenza estimates.[29], [36], [45] Also, RSV activity would be of greater concern in younger age groups than among children aged 5-17 years.

Laboratory RSV data sourced from the Eastern Sydney Laboratory Surveillance Program, NSW.

LagN = number of weeks by which the RSV data is lagged (varying by age group and database analysed).

The second sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effects of incomplete RSV virology data on model estimates of ILI attributed to RSV by restricting the Italian data to THE two seasons (2005 2007) which contained the majority of RSV-positive test reports.

RSV testing data from Primary Children's Medical Center were collected on children under two years of age (July 2001-June 2008).

While some reports have linked TLR4 Aspolymorphismmorphism with clinical outcomes of RSV infection, our data show that the haplotype comprised of Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile does not detectably impact the human immune response to RSV, as measured by the intermediate phenotype of RSV-stimulated cytokine responses or that of a well validated TLR4 ligand, LPS.

All 4 individual MAbs recognized bovine RSV by IFA (data not shown).

From these data, RSV was revealed to be the dominant species detected in patients with no history of wheezing and/or asthma (38 patients vs. 9 patients, p< 0.05), while HRV was dominant in those with a history of wheezing and/or asthma (12 patients vs. 24 patients, p< 0.05).