As previously the upper row shows topographic images, the middle row amplitude images and the lower row graphs of the corresponding PSD curves of surface roughness.
The upper row shows topographic images, the middle row amplitude images and the lower row graphs of the PSD curves of surface roughness.
The lower row graphs are histograms of point differences between the respective modalities.
The middle row graphs show values measured by the reference instrument (HFA, HFA, and VE/MAN, resp ., sorted by their ascending values, and values for the corresponding points measured by one other modality (VE/VG, VE/MAN, and VE/VG, resp).
We can analyze what is listed in the row point graph or column point graph as the dispersions in the row and column profiles are the same.
Enter the values of row 2: B2: -4; C2: Graphing D2: Graphing G2: =SQRT MIN('GOAL LOOKER' B2 B65)) which will cause an error until the Goal Looker worksheet is done.
The top row in graph (g 4) presents the corresponding pixel matching costs in radiance space with only one minimum among matching costs.
The top row in graph (g 3) shows how working in conventional intensity space results in very similar matching costs inside low texture areas that are very likely to cause a mismatch.
Equivalent findings hold for the small-world index (SW, see Figure 3, lower row), a graph measure commonly applied to assess small-world networks and relying on the here-discussed normalization [45]: it is defined as the ratio between normalized clustering coefficient and normalized path length.
In the bottom row, the graph on the left shows that run length l is distributed very differently for μ = 2, 3, 6 and μ = 11, when the proportion of the sequence deleted is exactly the same.
