Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Fig. 6 Histograms of convergence adoption rates and convergence rounds (negative externality effect).
After 14 rounds positive selection and 4 rounds negative selection, two aptamers with high binding affinity and good specificity were obtained, which have the dissociation constant Kd values of 1.60 ± 0.16 μM and 0.76 ± 0.18 μM, respectively.
$$\end{document} I 2 = max 0, ι ^ 2. Since truncation rounds negative values up to 0, the resulting truncation bias is positive.
$$\end{document} I 2 = max 0, ι ^ 2. Since truncation rounds negative values up to 0, truncation yields a positive bias.
Similar(55)
He was given a record of how his partner had behaved previously as well as some gossip — positive gossip in one round, negative in another.
The incident round negative correlation was IMD 2007 p = 0.002 (significant) and IMD 2010 p = 0.163 (not significant).
The vast majority of FIT participants would encourage friends and/or relatives to undergo screening (negative FIT participants: 95%, positive FIT participants: 92% P=0.060) and was willing to attend a successive screening round (negative FIT participants: 99%, positive FIT participants 92% P<0.001).
The same positive attitude towards screening was found in FS participants, who reported similarly high scores for encouraging friends and/or relatives to undergo screening (negative FS participants: 97.4%, positive FS participants: 99.4% P=0.024) and willingness to attend a successive screening round (negative FS participants: 92.7%, positive FS participants: 95.6% P=0.253).
Don't be intimidated by the negative sign — rounding negative numbers works exactly the same way as rounding positive numbers.
DNA collected from two rounds of negative selection were also sequenced and served as a negative control in the bioinformatics analysis.
However, despite 5 consecutive rounds of negative selection against excess (2 µg) Aβ40 fibrils, the percentage of RNA binding to fibrils, rather than decreasing, increased from 0.1 to 1.7% (Fig. 7).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com