She had never been fat, but she had always been a little rounded; now the roundness was gone.
In the actual world, however, the round square is neither round nor square, since roundness and squareness are "existence-entailing properties", i.e., "b is round/square" entails "b exists".
Each (shared) property is a universal a 'one over many instances,' whiteness over the many white things, roundness over the many round things, and so on.
But given that all properties come in nuclear-extranuclear pairs, one might say: The round square exemplifies only nuclear roundness and squareness, while every existent square exemplifies extranuclear squareness.
Secondly, the distinction entails that although roundness and squareness are universals, (round and square -ness isquare -ness gisenothat nothing can be round and sincee, (round and square)-ness can have no instances.
But, if roundness and squareness are universals and (round and square -ness exisquare -nesslausiblexists (round and square)-ness it a unisersal.
For instance, if I perceive a tomato, and it looks red and round to me, then redness and roundness are properties that perceptually appear to me.
When one has the sensation of seeing a round object, for example, one is directly aware of the roundness, even if the thing one is seeing is not really round.
Many of Kim's selfies highlight her very round breasts, before, during, and after the roundness created by pregnancy.
Thus, we both perceptually and conceptually focus on it and its visible properties such as its redness, roundness, etc., by applying our concepts, RED, ROUND, APPLE, to it on the basis of our visual experience.
Even geese can master such concepts as roundness and triangularity; after training, they can respond appropriately to round or triangular figures they have never seen before.
