Sentence examples for rotation between groups from inspiring English sources

To compare migration and rotation between groups at a given time, t-test was used.

Effect of treatments on body rotations between groups and within groups with multivariate analysis.

Analysis of variance was used to test for differences in translations and rotations between groups at 5 years.

Median rankings of self-confidence pre- and post-rotation were calculated; to test for differences in the median values between the start and end of rotation, and between groups, a non-parametric one-way analysis of variance statistic was used.

We analyzed differences in femoral component rotation between the group of knees that did not have ligament releases and the group that had ligament releases for statistical significance using the Student's t-test.

Recovery of external rotation was similar between groups.

In the recognition of shoes, there was a significant main effect, i.e. worse average performance among CPs (D = 4.46, df = 1, p = 0.035; βCP = −0.40, HPDI95% = [−0.95, 0.01]), but no significant difference in the influence of trial type or rotation between the two groups (LR-test of full against main effects model: D = 0.16, df = 2, p = 0.92).

Barrack et al. (2001) investigated 102 TKAs with a minimum follow-up of 5 years and found significant differences in tibial component rotation between the 2 groups, with patients with anterior knee pain averaging 6° of internal rotation (in relation to neutral TTA) as compared to 0.4° of external rotation in the control group.

However, post-op external rotation was not different between groups (Table  2).

During the efficiency tasks, the coupled L5/S1 moments in lateral bending and axial rotation were not significantly different between groups (t-test, p > 0.05).

Based on an estimated clinically important difference in BMD of 10% (SD 10), stem migration of 0.6 mm (SD 0.6), and stem rotation of 0.7 degrees (SD 0.7) between groups, the sample size calculation indicated 17 patients would be required in each group to achieve 80% power at the 0.05 significance level.